Reading Daily Kos these days is reminiscent of 2004 when Howard Dean was running for president. He, like today’s Bernie Sanders, was the far more progressive candidate than John Kerry. It was a regular cheerleading squad around here, such was the love for Dean. Of course, he could not close the deal, made a squeal, and was left as a footnote in presidential politics.
For those whose hackles are immediately raised when someone begins a post this way, please note that I am: a 10 year member of Daily Kos, a lifetime subscriber, have authored over 100 diaries, a “trusted user”, an elected official (city council), and somewhat pragmatic. So I read the diaries promoting Bernie Sanders with a bit of amusement and fascination. I share many of his thoughts about how America “should be,” so he is not a crackpot in any estimation. In fact, he is dead on right on so many issues.
My internal strife comes from rooting for the underdog (again) and watching him lose (again) and then having to “settle” for the more mainstream candidate in the general election. Most regular readers of Daily Kos will back whoever is the eventual nominee from our party, even if it is somewhat reluctantly. This begs the existential question: is it better to work hard (fundraising, phone calls, blogs, Facebook trolling, etc, etc), for the underdog or is it better to work (now) to bring Hillary Clinton further to the left and accept that she will be the nominee. The skeptic in me thinks that is the only reason Bernie Sanders got into the race in the first place: to make Clinton’s progressive street credibility even stronger by challenging her positions from the left, thereby making her go on record (as a progressive) on issues she may otherwise have tried to stay neutral on.
I understand that many folks here aren’t sold on Hillary for a variety of reasons. But the likelihood of her losing the primary to Bernie Sanders is slim to none. Rachel Maddow did a piece about a week or so ago discussing what happened to Newt Gingrich four years ago when he topped the Republican charts after winning two primary elections. That’s when the right wing “establishment” went on attack and essentially killed his candidacy from the inside. I’ll bet my last dollar if Bernie Sanders, as a Democrat, wins a few primary states early on, the Democratic Party establishment will poison his campaign and effectively end it. The question will remain at that point, does he run as an independent, thus pulling a Ralph Nader maneuver and hand the White House to whichever Republican wins that primary.
Regardless of which path this goes, my question to anybody who chooses to leave a comment is this: Would you work to defeat Hillary Clinton in the General Election by supporting an independent run for Sanders (and thus supporting the more progressive, ideological pure candidate) or do you bite the bullet and support the person carrying the banner for the Democratic Party, regardless if she doesn’t support all of your ideals exactly the way you’d like them to be supported?
I think for this go around, I’ll support Hillary starting now. It’s high time we had a woman running the show in this country. And you know, she’s progressive enough to have my back on most issues I care deeply about. And she’s amazingly intelligent, seasoned, and respected around the globe. We can’t lose by helping her win.